Jason Perlow: “It’s pretty darn clear to me that to make mojo, SuSE Linux Professional needs to look deep into its roots and re-birth itself as a public, open source project similar to Fedora.”
Jason Perlow: “It’s pretty darn clear to me that to make mojo, SuSE Linux Professional needs to look deep into its roots and re-birth itself as a public, open source project similar to Fedora.”
Jason Perlow: “And given that Debian has just dropped support for several key architectures,…”
Actually, in the original version of the draft, it was “And given that Debian is considering dropping support for several of its architectures…”
Funny how edit creep can change things…
Even IF they go the enthusiasts route, then what? They are the ARM/PPC guys to fedora’s i586/686? That doesn’t really fit the channel they are trying to stay in either.
They need to do something because 9.3 is as solid as the debian Sarge release. I’m just not sure what.
Jason Perlow: “First, the SuSE distribution build system is second to none. It would provide a community-driven version of Linux to a wide range of system architectures (x86, AMD64, IA64, IBM POWER, S390, and no one) — something that would be truly unique.”
yep, lots of funny quotes in this article.